It didn’t always used to be this way. The last will and testament of the great Jane Austen, for example, was only one paragraph long:

I Jane Austen of the Parish of Chawton do by this my last will I testament give and bequeath to my dearest sister Cassandra Elizabeth everything of which I may die possessed, or which may be hereafter due to me, subject to the payment of my Funeral expences, & to a Legacy of £50. to my Brother Henry, & £50 to Mde de Bigeon – which I request may be paid as soon as convenient. And I appoint my said dear sister the executrix of this my last will & testament.

Jane Austen

April 27 1817

Although this simplicity may have worked in 1817 England, it isn’t practical in the here and now. Things just aren’t that simple anymore. First of all, although Austen appoints her sister Cassandra as the executrix of her will, the will itself neglects to specify what powers are included in that appointment, leaving Cassandra effectively unable to carry out Austen’s wishes. Secondly, the will neglects to make alternative provisions—what if Cassandra had unexpectedly died before Jane? Also notably lacking (from our contemporary perspective) are any provisions for estate taxes. And finally, discerning readers may notice that the will does not include the signatures of any witnesses, something which would have been required if her will had been type-written.  Likely, it was only because her will was written entirely in her own hand, and her hand-writing was later authenticated by witnesses who authenticated her hand-writing, was the will upheld as valid.  In California, a type-written will must always be signed by at least two witnesses; the only exception  to this requirement is a “holographic” will, which is a will that is completely handwritten by the testator. 

We all may long for simpler times, especially when it comes to something most people think will only benefit their heirs and not themselves; but many of the rules and regulations that are dismissively thought of as “hoops to jump through” are there for your best interest. They exist to protect your heirs and your legacy from fraud, misuse, greed and neglect. Far from being a chore, creating a thoughtful and legally valid will these days is actually an act of love… One might even say it’s a matter of sense and sensibility.

But today’s blog post is not a cautionary tale about a family who put off their planning and regretted it, today’s post is about the peace and relief that forethought and planning brings not just to your family, but to you as the person making the plan.

In this article in Market Watch Chuck Jaffe tells the moving story of his brother Rob, who insisted 2 years ago on creating an estate plan even though he and his wife were both healthy. As Jaffe puts it, “While not pleasant subject matter, it was not morbid… you’d rather be drinking lemonade on the veranda, but it wasn’t a sharp stick in the eye.” However, when Rob became unexpectedly ill in May of this year the estate plan turned out to be a comfort to Rob and his family—such a comfort, according to Jaffe, that Rob “made me [Chuck] promise that I would write about him… when his time was up, because his story would help others.”

“People need to understand… how big a blessing it is to know — when their time comes — that they have everything in order, that they don’t need to stress or worry about how things they worked their whole life for are going to turn out. … I would not want to waste a minute of my life now having to do estate planning or worrying that I live long enough to get documents filed or whatever garbage comes with it… Focusing on death and dying while you are living, that’s easy; having to focus on death when you are dying, that would be unimaginable.”

In our business we frequently see how much easier it is for people to create a plan when they’re healthy, as opposed to the stress that comes with creating a plan when they are sick. Thank you Mr. Jaffe for sharing your brother’s moving story. We hope that your (and your brother’s) words will help motivate others to take comfort in planning ahead.

Naming your pet in your will or trust may seem odd, but it’s perfectly legitimate. Unfortunately, disinherited family members may not always agree. When Leona Helmsley passed away in 2007 she left $12 million to her dog, Trouble, but that amount was reduced by Judge Renee Roth of the Manhattan Surrogate Court to a mere $2 million. The current canine court battle is over the will of Miami heiress Gail Posner, which leaves $3 million to her dog Conchita, as well as $26 million split between seven of her bodyguards, housekeepers and other personal aides.

Naming your pet in your will may be perfectly legitimate, but the truth is that there is nothing to stop disgruntled family members from contesting your wishes. If you choose to do something “unusual” in your will or trust, or if you know of family members who are likely to make trouble, it may be necessary to take extra precautions to ensure your wishes are followed. For example, California permits the creation of a Pet Trust,  either as part of your “Living” Trust or as a stand-alone document.  Inform your estate planning attorney of the potential conflict and discuss what steps can be taken to prevent it. In some cases “no contest clauses” can be added to a will or trust to discourage court battles. In other cases a simple meeting of all family members with your attorney to explain your wishes and reasoning will do the trick. Talk to your attorney to find out what can be done to keep the peace in your family—canine or human.

A Will: A will is a formal declaration of your wishes. It is a document you create to declare the extent of your privately held property (it does not cover jointly owned property) and what your wishes are for the distribution of that property. You name an executor to carry out your wishes, and you can even include a nomination of guardian for young children in your will. A will does not go into effect until after you die; before then it is simply a piece of paper containing your private wishes. However, once you have passed away your will no longer remains private, it now becomes a matter of public record, available to anybody who would like to view it, and overseen by the court in a sometimes lengthy and expensive process called probate.

A Trust: A trust is a far more extensive tool than a will. In fact, there are many different kinds of trusts, each of which may be used for specific situations. Most trusts created for estate planning purposes are revocable living trusts (or RLTs.) An RLT is a document created not simply to distribute your property, but to own your property on your behalf, to be invested and spent for your benefit or the benefit of your named beneficiaries. As such, a trust takes effect as soon as you sign it and your property is protected by and subjected to the trust parameters as soon as you place them in the name of your trust. There is a lot of flexibility available with a trust, and yours can be created to fit your unique situation. Most RLTs name the trust creators as the initial trustees, nominating individuals or banks to take over as trustee when the creator becomes incapacitated or passes away. The benefit of a trust is that when the creator passes away, property is not merely distributed and that’s the end of it; the creator can instruct the trustee to distribute the money slowly and in any number of ways, even to the extent of creating new trusts for each beneficiary. Trusts can last for generations, as evidenced by the enduring Kennedy trusts.

Wills and trusts are necessary tools in estate planning, each one working in unique situations. Your attorney will be able to tell you which one is best for your family.

Part of the reason may certainly be fear and discomfort. Nobody likes to think about their own death, let alone talk about it with others; but neglecting to have this conversation now, while you are still alive and able to do so, means that you are leaving the conversation for your loved ones to have later, when they are hurt and grieving or burdened with care responsibilities.   It also means that you are unfairly asking them to guess at what your wishes may have been, and make difficult decisions that should have been yours to make.

This article by Michael O’Mara lists 10 things to for your family before you die. 10 things may seem like a tall order, especially when the subject is “the great hereafter”; but it seems a whole lot easier when you consider that 7 of the things listed are generally addressed as part of your estate planning with our firm—and we can help you with the other 3 things if you so desire. We would actually add to that list  a # 11 that is equally important:  plan for the possibility of needing long term care. This could be by purchasing appropriate long term care insurance (if you can qualify and it is affordable) or by creating powers in your estate planning documents to enable you to qualify for a public benefits subsidy to both help defray those costs and preserve your assets for your family.  Our firm is especially qualified to help with #11.

You wouldn’t leave it for your children to pack your suitcase after you’ve left on vacation—don’t leave it for them to make your difficult decisions after you’ve passed away or after you have become incapacitated. Take charge today.

How can you tell if a person is competent? In her book Senior Moments author Jacqueline D. Byrd quotes law professor Peter Margulies’ six factors to determine capacity:

1. Ability to articulate reasoning behind a decision
2. Variability of the client’s state of mind
3. Appreciation of the consequences of a decision
4. Irreversibility of a decision
5. Substantive fairness of a transaction
6. Consistency with lifetime commitments

Byrd goes on to say that for the purposes of determining whether or not a person is competent to sign a will or trust, however, the requirements may be slightly different; more focused on whether or not the principal has a clear knowledge of his or her assets, has a full knowledge of the persons to whom the estate is being left, and is able to reasonably formulate and express a plan for the disposition of the estate.

The unfortunate truth about elderly illness is that competency in a person afflicted with the beginnings of Alzheimer’s or Dementia can often change from day to day or even hour to hour. If there will be any question at all about the competency of the principal the safest thing to do is to have mental examination performed by a doctor, and even perhaps include a video  of the will signing. While the video is NOT a legal substitute for the Will or Trust, it can show mental competence at the time of signing if it is properly handled.  Of course the very best way to ensure mental competence is to create your estate plan early, before age or dementia becomes a factor.

“Nov. 29, 1895. I give to my cousin, Nettie M. Cowan, all money that I have in the Bowery Savings Bank.
Aletta Stager, 131 Berkeley Place, Brooklyn, N.Y.”

Of course, things have changed in the probate and estate planning world in the one hundred plus years since Ms. Stager executed her will. A glaring omission from the two lines above is the nomination of an executor. If you don’t nominate an executor in your will the court  may choose one for you. Also, even if you have only one person in mind as your beneficiary, you’ll want to include secondary beneficiaries, who can include charities and non-profits if you don’t have any family or friends to whom you’d like to leave your estate.

Even back in 1895 Aletta Stager’s property ended up going to the state of New York when no heirs—including the named beneficiary—could be found. Perhaps if Ms. Stager had included a couple more lines in her will her estate could have gone to benefit her favorite charity instead of being swallowed up by the state.

What are your options when you know your kids won’t like what you’ve put in your will or trust? Many people choose to simply keep their wishes secreted away in a safety deposit box until they’ve passed away and then let everyone fight it out on their own; but this only puts off the bad feelings and can often cause lasting rifts among siblings. This strategy of secrecy also doesn’t address what happens if you become incapacitated and need one of your trustees or agents (in all likelihood one of your children) to take over your affairs.

A better option than secrecy may be to invite your children to your final meeting with your estate planning attorney.  If the attorney is willing, and if you have good relationships with your children, this may be a good move.  It could give you an opportunity to share your plans in the presence of a knowledgeable professional who is on your side; it also gives your children the opportunity to ask questions and get clear and immediate answers. More often than not tension about mom and dad’s estate plan stems from a lack of understanding, or a worry that mom or dad have been taken advantage of.  

Such a meeting might be especially valuable where you have remarried and plan to provide for your new partner in your plan, before providing for children, either yours or your new spouse’s.  A meeting might help explain your wishes.  Ask your attorney for his or her view on this when you discuss your plan.   While a family meeting is not for every familiy, still for many it can be reassuring, educational, and put everyone one the same page while moving into the future.

When a will, or a Trust,  is contested by an angry beneficiary (or someone who thought they should have been a beneficiary), the core motivation is often more about emotion than finances. Unfortunately, however, a will contest (if the contest is deemed valid)—and the ensuing litigation process—will delay probate considerably and make it significantly more expensive.

For this reason, if you are named as the executor of a will, it is important to know what the legitimate grounds for will contests are, and to have a trusted attorney to whom you can turn if and when surprises occur. Serving as executor of a will can be stressful enough when everything goes as planned; dealing with the unexpected—especially when those surprises come from hurt or angry relatives—can take over every part of your life and have a lasting effect on family dynamics.  A trust may also be contested, on most of the same grounds. 

We hope you will never have to deal with a will contest in your family; but if you do, we hope you will let our firm help you make the process as fair and as painless as possible.

A will, although it can remain private during your lifetime, becomes a matter of public record once it is submitted to the probate courts after your death. But a trust is a private document, and in most cases remains private even after your death.

Jackson’s will does reveal a few details, though, namely who he chose as guardian for his children.  In paragraph 8 of his will, on page 4, just above his signature, Jackson states:

“If any of my children are minors at the time of my death, I nominate my mother, KATHERINE JACKSON as guardian of the persons and estates of such minor children. If KATHERINE JACKSON fails to survive me, or is unable or unwilling to act as guardian, I nominate DIANA ROSS as guardian of the persons and estates of such minor children.”

Whether Jackson’s wishes for guardianship will be followed remains to be seen.  As Jackson’s ex-wife and mother of his two oldest children, Deborah Rowe would normally automatically be awarded custody.  However, there are still too many unanswered questions about the status of Rowe’s parental rights—and her desire to assert those rights—to make any claims for certain.

The one thing that is certain, however, is that whatever odd and inexplicable things Jackson may have done during his life,  he seems to have done what he should to provide for his family’s financial needs and their privacy after his death.

Have you done the same?

A video will is created when the testator reads his or her will in front of a video camera, and occasionally explains why certain gifts were granted and why some were not. It may include some discussion back and forth between the drafting attorney and the client,  in regard to selected provisions of the Will, some detail in regard to family members mentioned or omitted, and perhaps some general colloquy to show that the person making the Will was of sound mind.  The benefit of creating a video will is that it can be used to establish the mental competence of the testator.  As such, a video will can be especially helpful to elderly clients whose heirs might be inclined to contest the will on the grounds that the testator was not of sound mind, or was making the Will subject to the undue influence of others.

Although a video will can be a helpful addition to your estate plan, it can in no way replace an official paper copy, signed in the presence of witnesses. A physical writing of your will—drafted by a knowledgeable attorney and with your official signature made in the presence of the required witnesses—is the only valid legal evidence of your wishes for the distribution of your property. A video will by itself will not hold up in probate court. 

Technology brings great improvements to our lives, but adaptation takes time. Talk to your attorney first if you are considering incorporating a video will into your estate plan. Although it can be helpful, a video will is not always necessary, and could in some cases be detrimental if not done correctly.  You should only film under the advice and supervision of your trusted attorney.