Lawyer For Seniors

Hayward: (510) 247-2555
Pleasanton: (925) 847-0737
Email: Gene@LawyerForSeniors.com
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Medi-Cal Planning
    • Estate Planning
    • Trust Administration
    • Probate
    • Hospice Planning
    • Veteran’s Benefits
    • Disability Planning
    • Special Needs Planning
    • Long-Term Care
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Blog

Article: Repeal of Estate Tax May Warrant a Fresh Look At the Use of Disclaimers To Avoid Death Tax

The end of the estate tax during 2010 might only be a temporary reprieve. As the law now stands, for persons dying in 2011 estates valued above $1,000,000 will be subject to estate tax at very hefty rates rising as high as 55%. This circumstance suddenly creates the real possibility that estates valued at greater than $1,000,000 will later create estate tax problems for “downstream beneficiaries”. That’s the bad news. But, the good news is that there may be an estate planning technique to minimize or avoid this result. It is called a “disclaimer.”

A disclaimer is an irrevocable and unqualified refusal by a person to accept an interest in property. It is a right often built into attorney-drafted trusts and wills. The right of disclaimer permits the intended recipient to reject all or a portion of a bequest, with the result that it then passes without estate or gift tax directly to the next person or persons named in the trust or will or, if none, then to the disclaimant’s heirs at law. In many families, the next in line after the surviving spouse will usually be the couple’s children. With the threat of the return of the estate tax in 2011 for estates valued over $1,000,000, the surviving spouse of a person dying this year may now have good reason to consider a timely disclaimer. Doing so may eliminate tax as assets pass on down to the couple’s children. The use of disclaimers in this context is best explained by the following example:

John and Mary are a married couple and have a combined marital estate worth approximately $2,000,000. They have three loving children. If John dies in 2010, there would be no estate tax under current law. But if he leaves everything to Mary, her estate would then be worth $2,000,000. Absent a further change in the law, if Mary dies in 2011 or thereafter, the excess above $1,000,000 (i.e. $1,000,000) would then be subject to estate tax. Her estate would then owe hundreds of thousands of dollars to the IRS.

But there may be a way to pass the excess on to the children tax free: if within nine months of John’s death Mary properly disclaims the excess above $1,000,000, the disclaimed portion would go directly to their three children without tax because it would rely upon John’s $1,000,000 exemption, and that disclaimed portion would later escape tax entirely on Mary’s death as it would never have become a part of her estate. In addition, her retained $1,000,000 would also pass tax free, as it would be within Mary’s own $1,000,000 exemption. The result: there would be no estate or gift tax, either at John’s death or at Mary’s later death, and the entire marital estate of $2,000,000 would then pass on down to their children, tax free.

In order to make a valid disclaimer, there are some IRS rules that Mary must follow, including the following: (1) she cannot have used the disclaimed portion of the estate or received any benefit from it; (2) the disclaimed portion must pass without any direction by her (i.e., it must pass automatically to whomever is next in line — presumably the children – and Mary cannot direct it elsewhere); (3) the disclaimer must be in writing; and (4) the disclaimer must be made within nine months of John’s death. Under Internal Revenue Code § 2518, that portion of a bequest which is properly and timely disclaimed is considered as if it had never been transferred to Mary. Further, she will not even be deemed to have made a taxable gift to the children.

Formerly, disclaimers were usually considered tools for estates of much greater value, as the exemptions through 2009 would easily protect up to $7,000,000 for married couples who had created an estate plan with tax shelter objectives. Now, however, persons with more modest estates should consider use of disclaimers. As of this writing, our recommendation to clients is as follows: (1) be sure that your estate plan includes disclaimer provisions in the trust or will; (2) watch developments in Congress closely over the course of the next several months of this year; and (3) wherever possible, delay closure of estates valued in excess of $1,000,000, so as to determine whether a disclaimer may be necessary in order to reduce or eliminate estate tax for downstream beneficiaries. In administering estates of persons dying this year, it might be advisable to take a “wait and see” approach to help decide whether a disclaimer might be necessary. Just be sure not to let the nine month time limit run on the right to disclaim.

 Lastly, one cannot circumvent the limited estate tax exemption by opting to make large gifts during life. Except for annual exclusion gifts not exceeding $13,000/year/recipient, the $1,000,000 lifetime gift exemption is scheduled to remain in effect and will be charged against and thereby reduce the available estate tax exemption, so that one cannot “double up” and use both. Lifetime gifts in excess of this $1,000,000 will continue to be taxed at significant gift tax rates.

Article Categories

  • General Articles (220)
  • Articles For Professionals (9)
  • Estate Planning (6)
  • Medi-Cal Planning (6)
    • Annuities (1)
  • Current Events (5)
  • Health Care (4)
  • Elder Law (3)
  • Trust Administration (3)
  • Tax Law (2)
  • Retirement Planning (1)
  • Special Needs Planning (1)
  • Veterans Pension Planning (1)

Newsletter Signup

Practice Areas Contact Us

Site Search

Law Offices

Serving The East Bay of San Francisco, and surrounding cities

 

TEL: (510) 247-2555
TEL: (925) 847-0737
FAX: (510) 247-0150

  

Other Resources

  • KDIA 1640 - Financing The Cost Of Long Term Care

Elder Law Blog

  • Stimulus Payments Will Not Impair Medi-Cal, SSI, Nor Covered CA Eligibility
  • Medi-Cal Myths Uncovered
  • Preservation of Parent’s Low Property Tax Rate Soon to Be More Difficult for Children: Planning ‘Window’ Closing
  • Consider Tax Savvy Year-End Gifts
  • Social Security Benefits To Increase Modestly in 2021

Recent Articles

  • SNT’s Can Protect Public Benefits In Divorce. Revised
  • New ‘Secure Act’ Makes Big Changes To IRA’s and Other Retirement Plans
  • The New CA Decanting Statute: Some Advisory Cautions *
  • USING ‘UNAVAILABILITY’ TO REDUCE SPEND DOWN AND/OR SECURE RETROACTIVE MEDI-CAL ELIGIBILITY

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.